Financial Forecasting ROI Calculator

See how gaps in cash flow forecasting, revenue projections, and scenario modeling translate into real dollars lost in your business.

Financial Impact of Poor Forecasting

Adjust the sliders to mirror your reality. Defaults are set to the Base (average) percentage for a $50M mid-market profile.
Tip: Use whole dollars. We’ll format results automatically.

Quick Totals

Lost Revenue
$0
Higher Costs
$0
Grand Total Impact
$0

Quick Section Subtotals

Liquidity & Financing
$0
Working Capital & Ops
$0
Revenue Growth & Market
$0
Capital Allocation
$0

ROI with Dryrun

Total Negative Impact
$0
Potential Savings
$0
ROI %
0%
Liquidity & Financing: At 60% savings, Dryrun reduces emergency borrowing and LOC days by forecasting cash position with weekly/day-by-day clarity and payment sequencing.
Working Capital & Ops: At 60% savings, Dryrun trims DSO/DIH and avoidable fees by aligning collections, buys, and production with scenario-based cash plans.
Revenue Growth & Market: At 60% savings, Dryrun recaptures lost sales and waste by syncing demand signals to inventory/capacity and testing GTM timing in scenarios.
Capital Allocation & Strategic Value: At 60% savings, Dryrun raises hit-rate on investments by modeling alternatives, constraints, and WACC-aware outcomes before committing.
Driver-level Selections
Driver Your % Impact $ Type
Types: Revenue = lost sales; Cost = financing/process/other leakage.

Sources:

Liquidity & Financing Costs

Liquidity crises & shortfall spikes — 1.20% (Cost)
SMBs run thin cash buffers (median ~27 days), so modest forecast misses force short-notice borrowing at prime-indexed rates and fees. Fed Small Business Credit Survey (SBCS) shows “uneven cash flow” is a top challenge; prime is 7.50% today and small-business LOCs price at prime-plus. Your 1.2% mid-range “spike cost” is consistent with periodic emergency draws rather than chronic distress.
– JPMorgan Chase
– Fed Communities
Bankratewellsfargo.com

Higher financing costs (LOC utilization) — 1.00% (Cost)
Keeping extra balance days on a revolver compounds quickly at today’s benchmarks: WSJ Prime = 7.50%; typical bank LOCs run prime+ spreads (e.g., Wells Fargo lists Prime +1.75% to +9.75%). Reported small-business bank loan rates in 2025 span roughly 6.6%–11.5%+; Bankrate also notes LOC ranges and extra draw fees. A modest drift in average utilization readily lands near a ~1.0% P&L drag.
Bankrate+1
wellsfargo.com
NerdWallet

Damaged supplier/lender terms — 0.70% (Cost)
Skipping standard 2/10, net 30 discounts has an ~36% effective annual cost; repeated unpredictability leads suppliers to tighten terms and lenders to add spread/covenants. Fed SLOOS shows banks tighten C&I standards/terms—often citing a more uncertain outlook—raising borrowing cost for less “trustworthy” cash profiles.
– McKinsey & Company

– Federal Reserve

Increased volatility (cash buffers/financing) — 0.30% (Cost)
Volatile demand raises required buffers (safety stock grows with demand σ and service levels); in finance terms, more volatility = more idle cash or credit utilization. SBCS documents widespread uneven cash flows, reinforcing the need for bigger buffers.
jopafl.com
Fed Small Business

Working Capital & Operational Efficiency

Excess working capital tied up — 0.80% (Cost)
Large, addressable WC opportunities persist even among big public firms. J.P. Morgan’s 2024 Working Capital Index shows elevated cash locked in receivables/inventory with clear headroom to release. A conservative leakage estimate near ~0.8% is consistent with small percentage improvements in DSO/DIO at today’s rates.
JPMorgan Chase

Margin erosion (rebates/expedite/holding) — 0.60% (Cost)
Forecast misses trigger premium freight/overtime, missed volume rebates, and higher carrying costs. Classic bullwhip research (Lee–Padmanabhan–Whang) documents the cascade into expedited shipments and overtime; carrying cost of inventory is commonly in the 20–30%/yr range. Together, modest frequency × modest severity easily sums to ~0.6%.
Temple University Community
FSN - The Modern Finance Forum

Manual & fragmented processes — 0.50% (Cost)
McKinsey finds ~40%+ of finance tasks are automatable, with digitization cutting manual reconciliation/planning effort materially. In forecasting contexts, less manual friction = faster cycle/less error, so a ~0.5% overhead drag from fragmentation is defensible.
McKinsey & Company

Capacity mismatches (OT/idle/outsource) — 0.50% (Cost)
When plans are wrong, you pay for overtime (legally 1.5× regular rate under FLSA) and then hit diminishing returns on output per hour. Pencavel’s classic study shows productivity flattens/declines beyond thresholds—so “buying hours” is increasingly expensive. A small, recurring 0.5% EBIT hit is realistic.
– DOLIZA

Revenue Growth & Market Impact

Stockouts / overstocking — 1.10% (Cost)
Stockouts drive lost sales and loyalty, while overstocking inflates holding/markdowns. IHL estimates global out-of-stocks costs in the hundreds of billions; McKinsey shows better OSA and uncertainty management can lift revenue ~3% via fewer stockouts and less expediting. A blended 1.1% hit is conservative for mid-market.
– The World Bank DocsMcKinsey & Company

Unreliable growth projections — 0.70% (Cost)
Poor demand signals propagate bullwhip (excess inventory here, lost sales there). Firms that “bet better” with analytics see ~3% revenue uptick. The link: tighter projections → better service levels and promotion planning → fewer missed sales.
Temple University Community
McKinsey & Company

Missed opportunities (can’t commit cash) — 0.60% (Cost)
When forecasts are noisy and liquidity is tight, firms under-invest. Foundational corporate-finance evidence shows financing constraints/uncertainty depress investment (and growth). A small but persistent 0.6% “opportunity cost” fits the literature.
– Brookings
– 
Federal Reserve

Inability to respond to shocks — 0.80% (Cost)
Resilient operators that sense/respond faster outperform via fewer stockouts, lower expedite/overtime, and better allocation. Case evidence and McKinsey analysis link better uncertainty management to ~3% revenue gains and lower COGS—your 0.8% penalty for being “slow to pivot” is well supported.
McKinsey & Company

Strategic paralysis — 0.40% (Cost)
Uncertainty + cognitive traps (anchoring, status-quo bias) delay or derail moves. HBR’s classic synthesis shows how these traps systematically erode decision quality, which—under volatile conditions—translates into real growth leakage. A modest 0.4% strategic drag is prudent.
– Moody's Ratings

Capital Allocation & Strategic Value

Misallocation of capital — 0.60% (Cost)
Misallocated resources are a first-order productivity (and value) drain. OECD/IMF/World Bank work documents sizable TFP gaps from misallocation—improving allocation even a little produces meaningful performance lift, so a ~0.6% steady-state drag is reasonable.
– OECD
IMF

Eroded external credibility — 0.40% (Cost)
Ratings frameworks explicitly assess management/forecasting quality; weak planning/controls show up as tighter covenants/spreads and lower headroom. S&P’s Management & Governance criteria and Moody’s methodologies detail how planning/financial policy affect credit risk and funding costs—supporting a modest 0.4% cost of capital/terms penalty.
S&P GlobalMoody's Ratings

Notes on why these sources justify the numbers

Benchmarks & prices: Prime at 7.50% and published bank LOC spreads (Prime +1.75% to +9.75%) validate your interest-rate math for emergency draws and higher average utilization.
Bankratewellsfargo.com

Cash-buffer fragility: 27-day SMB cash buffers and SBCS “uneven cash flows” show why small forecast errors can become borrowing events.
JPMorgan ChaseFed Communities

Operational knock-ons: Bullwhip → premium freight/overtime → margin leakage, while inventory carrying costs are widely estimated at 20–30%/yr, supporting the rebate/expedite/holding driver.
Temple University Community
FSN - The Modern Finance Forum

Decision/credibility channels: Established finance research ties uncertainty/constraints to lower investment; ratings criteria tie planning/forecasting quality to funding terms.
Federal Reserve
Brookings
S&P Global

See if Dryrun is a fit for you.

data graphic