Cash flow forecasting is one of those disciplines everyone agrees is important, yet many organizations still struggle to do it well. Spreadsheets proliferate, assumptions live in people’s heads, and forecasts quickly become outdated. Often, the root of the problem isn’t effort or intent; it’s that teams are starting from the wrong place.

At the center of this challenge is a foundational question: should you forecast cash flow using the direct method or the indirect method?

Both approaches have legitimate uses in finance. But they serve very different purposes. Understanding how they differ, and how they relate to forecasting, can dramatically improve the clarity, usefulness, and reliability of your cash flow outlook. When combined with a weekly rolling cadence, the right approach turns forecasting from a backward-looking exercise into a forward-looking management tool.

The Two Ways to Look at Cash Flow

Most finance professionals first encounter cash flow through the indirect method because it’s the standard format used in financial statements. Indirect cash flow starts with net income and then adjusts for non-cash items like depreciation and changes in working capital accounts such as accounts receivable, accounts payable, and inventory.

This approach is extremely valuable for explaining why profit does not equal cash. A business can be profitable on paper while still struggling to pay its bills. Indirect cash flow highlights the drivers behind that gap and helps stakeholders understand how accounting results translate into cash movement.

However, indirect cash flow is fundamentally an explanatory view of cash. It’s designed to reconcile the income statement to the balance sheet. It tells a story about what happened.

The direct method, on the other hand, starts in a very different place. Instead of beginning with profit, it begins with actual expected cash movements: how much money is coming in, when it’s coming in, how much is going out, and when those payments will occur.

Rather than asking, “How did we get from profit to cash?” the direct method asks, “What cash will hit the bank, and what cash will leave?”

That distinction may sound subtle, but in practice it changes everything.

Why Direct Cash Flow Is Better Suited to Forecasting

Forecasting is inherently forward-looking. It’s about anticipating future conditions so decisions can be made before problems arise. That makes timing the central issue.

Leaders rarely lose sleep over whether depreciation is added back correctly. They lose sleep over whether payroll can be met next Friday, whether a tax payment collides with a vendor run, or whether an upcoming sales shortfall will create a liquidity crunch.

The direct method aligns perfectly with these concerns because it mirrors how cash actually behaves in the real world. Customers pay on certain days. Payroll runs on specific cycles. Loan payments hit on fixed dates. Taxes have deadlines. When forecasts are built around these realities, they become immediately understandable and actionable.

Indirect forecasts, by contrast, tend to obscure timing. They rely on projected changes in balances rather than explicit cash events. That can work for high-level modeling, but it makes it difficult to answer practical questions such as, “Which week will we be tight?” or “How long can we afford this hiring plan?”

For this reason, most organizations that move toward mature cash flow forecasting eventually gravitate to the direct method for operational use. Indirect cash flow doesn’t disappear, it becomes a complementary view used to explain results and support longer-term strategic modeling. But direct cash flow becomes the engine that runs day-to-day cash management.

Forecasting Is Not a Monthly Activity

Another major reason forecasts fail is cadence. Monthly cash flow forecasts often look tidy, but they hide volatility. A business can appear fine at a monthly level while experiencing severe swings within the month.

Weekly forecasting exposes reality.

A weekly rolling cash flow forecast shows how cash behaves across short intervals, making it much easier to spot trouble early. Instead of discovering a problem when the bank balance is already low, you see it forming weeks in advance.

The “rolling” aspect is equally important. A rolling forecast always extends forward. Each week, the completed period drops off, a new future week is added, and assumptions are refreshed. The horizon stays constant, commonly 13 weeks or 26 weeks, but the view is always current.

This approach shifts forecasting from a periodic exercise into a continuous process.

What Building a Weekly Rolling Forecast Really Looks Like

A weekly rolling forecast begins with a simple foundation: the current cash balance. Everything flows from there.

From that starting point, expected cash inflows are layered in. For most companies, the largest component is customer collections. Rather than using invoice dates, strong forecasts focus on expected payment timing. Historical patterns are extremely useful here. If customers typically pay 45 days after invoicing, receipts should be placed accordingly. Over time, these patterns become more accurate as assumptions are refined.

Other inflows such as deposits, refunds, rebates, interest income, or one-time receipts are added based on known or reasonably expected timing.

Next come cash outflows. These include accounts payable, payroll and benefits, rent, software subscriptions, taxes, debt service, and capital expenditures. Large or irregular items are usually broken out separately so they don’t get lost inside broad categories.

Once inflows and outflows are mapped by week, net cash flow for each week is calculated. That net change is then added to the opening balance to arrive at the ending cash balance, which becomes the opening balance for the following week.

This simple mechanical structure is powerful. It creates a chain of visibility from today’s cash to where cash will be several months from now.

The Real Value Comes from Updating

The forecast itself is only half the equation. The real value comes from the weekly update rhythm.

Each week, actual results replace prior assumptions. New information is incorporated: a customer delays payment, a vendor requests earlier settlement, a new deal closes, or a hiring plan changes. The forecast is adjusted accordingly.

Over time, this feedback loop sharpens accuracy. Patterns emerge. Assumptions become grounded in reality rather than optimism.

Most importantly, leadership begins to trust the forecast. When that happens, it becomes a decision-making tool rather than a reporting artifact.

Scenarios Turn Forecasts into Strategy

Once a baseline weekly forecast is in place, scenarios unlock an entirely new level of value.

Instead of debating ideas abstractly, teams can model them:

- What happens if collections slow by ten days?
- What if we delay hiring by one month?
- What if sales land at 80% of plan?
- What if we secure a line of credit?

Each scenario creates a different cash trajectory. Leaders can see not only whether a strategy is viable, but when it creates pressure and how large that pressure becomes.

This is where cash flow forecasting evolves from finance hygiene into strategic advantage.

Where Many Teams Go Wrong

Common issues tend to surface repeatedly: relying on indirect cash flow as the primary forecast, aggregating categories so broadly that drivers are hidden, updating infrequently, or treating the forecast as something built for management rather than used by management.

All of these lead to the same outcome: a forecast that exists, but does not influence behavior.

The goal is not to produce a perfect spreadsheet. The goal is to create a living model that reflects reality closely enough to guide action.

Bringing It All Together

Indirect cash flow is excellent for explaining the past. Direct cash flow is essential for managing the future.

When organizations adopt the direct method for forecasting and pair it with a weekly rolling cadence, they gain visibility into timing, control over outcomes, and confidence in decisions.

Instead of reacting to cash surprises, they anticipate them. Instead of hoping liquidity holds, they design plans that ensure it does.

The shift from hindsight to foresight is what separates companies that merely survive from those that are positioned to grow with intention.

‍

________

Dryrun delivers real-time, dynamic cash flow and financial forecasts with complete manual control and unlimited scenario modeling.
‍START YOUR TRIAL today!

‍